Wickersham v. Crittenden

Good Law
110 Cal. 332·1895 Cal. LEXIS 1060·42 P. 893
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1895No. 16003California638 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The plaintiff, as a stockholder in the Bank of San Luis Obispo, brings this action on behalf of himself and other stockholders, for the benefit of the corporation, to compel the defendant to account for and pay over to the corporation certain moneys received by him ostensibly for his salary as president, but which the plaintiff alleges were received without right. The facts out of which the cause of action is claimed to arise are stated in the opinion given in Wickersham v. Crittenden, 93 Cal. 17 , and in an action similar to the present which was brought May 16, 1892, with reference to the salary received by the defendant prior to that date, and which is reported in 106 Cal. 327 . The present action was brought May 24, 1893, and it is alleged in the complaint that the defendant had received of the moneys of the corporation the sum of four hundred dollars per month, from May 16, 1892, until November 1, 1892, and that the only salary that he was authorized to receive was fixed by the directors at two hundred dollars per month, in October, 1890. The court found that the defendant had received the salary of four hundred dollars a month from May 16, 1892, up to and including the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.