Gunst

People ex rel. Menzies v. Gunst

Good Law
110 Cal. 447·1895 Cal. LEXIS 1078·42 P. 963
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1895S. F. No. 56California1,003 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

This is an action in quo warranto to test relator’s title to the office of police commissioner of the city and county of San Francisco, against the claims of defendant thereto. Judgment passed for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

The facts, about which there is no controversy, are that R. P. Hammond was a member of the original board of police commissioners of the city and county of San Francisco, appointed under the provisions of the act of the legislature approved April 1, 1878, and commonly known as the “ McCoppin act.”

Hammond continued in office until his death, which occurred in the year 1891. At and after the time of his death H. H. Markham was the governor of the state, and he appointed D. M. Burns to fill the vacancy thus arising.

Burns qualified, became, and acted as, a member of the board until January 5, 1895. Upon that day a vacancy occurred in the office by the resignation of said Burns. The governor, Markham, upon said last-named day appointed defendant Gunst to fill this vacant office.

Upon the seventh day of January Gunst qualified, and entered upon the discharge of his duties. Thereafter, on said day, the said Markham was succeeded as governor of the state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.