Schlicker
Schlicker v. Hemenway
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Temple, J.
This is an appeal taken from a judgment rendered because defendants declined to answer after their demurrer was overruled.
The action is brought against defendant individually, and as executor of the estate of Greenbury Hinkston, deceased, to recover seven hundred and fifty dollars, received by Hemenway under the following circumstances, as set out in the complaint:
The complaint was demurred to on various grounds, and, among others, on the ground that there is a misjoinder of parties defendant, in that Hemenway, as an individual, is joined with the representative of the estate of Hinkston, when the complaint not only fails to show a joint or joint and several liability, but shows that both cannot be liable. Also, that there is a misjoinder of causes of action, with specifications very nearly as above. Also, that the complaint is ambiguous, because it cannuu be ascertained therefrom whether it is sought to charge Hemenway or the estate. Also, uncertain for the same reason.
The demurrer should have been sustained on all these grounds. The complaint is also specially demurred to on the ground that it does not state a cause of notion against Hemenway, and, separately, that it does…