Ashworth

Butler v. Ashworth

Good Law
110 Cal. 614·1895 Cal. LEXIS 1107·43 P. 4
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 30, 1895No. 15984California1,437 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fleet, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against the city and county of San Francisco alone, to recover damages to her property caused by a broken sewer. The complaint was in two counts, the first upon the breaking of the sewer and the neglect to repair the same, and the second upon the negligent and improper manner in which the break was repaired—the proximate and efficient cause of damage assigned in each count being the inundation of plaintiff’s premises by the overflow from the broken and choked-up sewer; and the damages alleged in each count being identical as to time, manner, and extent.

In that action plaintiff recovered a judgment for eleven hundred and ninety dollars and her costs of suit.

Within two years after the bringing of that action, and before the satisfaction of the judgment therein, plaintiff brought the present action against the defendant Ashworth, as superintendent of streets of said city, and the other defendants as his deputies, wherein, in a single count exactly similar in all substantial respects to the second count in the first-named action, she sought damages accruing to her property through the breaking of said sewer, the immediate cause of damage assigned being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.