Wheeler

Wheeler v. Donnell

Good Law
110 Cal. 655·1896 Cal. LEXIS 529·43 P. 1
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 1896L. A. No. 91California904 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

This is a proceeding brought against J. A. Donnell, district attorney of Los Angeles county, *656 by accusation, under the provisions of section 772 of the Penal Code, alleging misdemeanors in office. The accusation was tried upon the complaint and answer; and judgment was rendered upon the merits, exonerating the accused and dismissing the complaint. This is an appeal by the accuser, Wheeler, from said judgment. Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that no appellate jurisdiction in such cases is vested in this court; and this is the only point here involved.

In In re Curtis, 108 Cal. 661 , the question here involved was directly presented, and this court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction to entertain it. The reasoning upon which the conclusion was there arrived at is entirely satisfactory to us, and it would hardly seem that further consideration of the subject is necessary. That decision is based upon the broad proposition that the proceeding is a criminal one, not prosecuted by information or indictment, and, therefore, without the appellate jurisdiction of this court. That this proceeding is a criminal one, and in its nature a prosecution for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.