Morey

Rozecrans Gold Mining Co. v. Morey

Good Law
111 Cal. 114·1896 Cal. LEXIS 552·43 P. 585
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 1896Sac. No. 12California1,245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

This is an action in equity, involving the ownership of certain mining property. Plaintiff became financially embarrassed, and the property was sold under execution sales, and also sold for nonpayment of taxes. Deeds passed to Morey, the defendant, under these execution sales, and also under the delinquent tax sale. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered against it, and also from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

There are many questions discussed by counsel in *115 their respective briefs, but at the threshold of the case a single matter presents itself, which, upon consideration, we think necessarily points the judgment. The regularity of the proceedings leading up to the execution sales and the tax sale are not attacked, but it is insisted that Morey during all these times was a director and trustee of the corporation plaintiff, and, as such director and trustee, all his dealings with the property of plaintiff must be held to have been for its benefit, and that, by reason of his fiduciary relation, whatever title to plaintiff’s property came to him is held as trustee for plaintiff. Of course, this principle of law is elementary, and must prevail here if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.