DeLany

DeLany v. Knapp

Good Law
111 Cal. 165·1896 Cal. LEXIS 561·43 P. 598
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1896L. A. No. 1California965 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Appeals from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial. The action was to quiet title to one hundred and sixty acres of land. The facts of the case are as follow:

Upon March 18, 1893, Neil, by deed of grant duly recorded, conveyed the land to Mrs. A. L. Treanor. Upon the fifth day of May following, Mrs. Treanor, by like deed of grant, also duly recorded, reconveyed the same property to Neil. Upon May 10th, five days after, a deficiency judgment was docketed against Neil, and in favor of this plaintiff. The land in controversy was then subjected to levy, and, on the fifteenth day of June, 1893, was sold at public auction, and purchased by this plaintiff. Thereafter, upon the twenty-third day of November, 1893, Neil executed his deed of grant to the same land to one Pauly, to whose title these defendants afterward succeeded.

For the reasons hereafter given we consider it unnecessary to pass upon the question whether, by his commutation, the character of the title Neil received from the government was that inuring under a homestead, or that attaching to a pre-emption patent. For the purposes of this consideration, it will be assumed (though not decided) that Neil took the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.