Charnock

Charnock v. Higuerra

Good Law
111 Cal. 473·1896 Cal. LEXIS 1044·44 P. 171
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 10, 1896L. A. No. 76California2,609 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fleet, J.

This is an action brought by several riparian proprietors against certain persons above them on the stream, to restrain them from diverting any of the waters of the stream.

*475 The complaint alleges that the plaintiffs are riparian proprietors, and as such entitled to all the waters of the stream; that the defendants are not entitled to use any of the water for any purpose; and that they, by means of certain machinery, artificially and wrongfully raise and divert from the stream a large amount of the waters thereof, for the purpose of irrigating certain lands not of right irrigable from the stream, and which do not so lie as to be irrigated by the waters of said stream “diverted therefrom by any natural means” on said lands.-

The facts found by the court are in substance: That both plaintiffs and defendants are riparian proprietors on the stream, the lands of defendants being above those of plaintiffs; and that neither plaintiffs nor defendants have any right to the waters of the stream, except as such riparian owners. That all of the lands of the plaintiffs, and thirty acres of the lands of the defendants, are so situated that the water of the stream can be diverted and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.