Gilman

Gilman v. McClatchy

Good Law
111 Cal. 606·1896 Cal. LEXIS 629·44 P. 241
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 20, 1896Sac. No. 37California1,466 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Appeals from the judgment, and from the order denying a new trial.

Plaintiff’s action was for damages resulting from a *609 libel of and concerning him, published by defendants in their newspaper, the Evening Bee.

Defendants admitted the publication and their responsibility therefor, but denied that it was libelous. As an affirmative defense in justification they pleaded that the publication was true. In mitigation of damages they further averred their belief in its truth, and that the publication was made only after a due and careful inquiry which satisfied them of the truth of the matters in the publication contained.

The libel was a publication of what purported to be the narrative of one Stella Truitt of the circumstances of a rape committed upon her by Gilman (this plaintiff) while she was employed as a servant in his house. “Mrs. Truitt,” so began the account, “has every appearance of an honest woman, and as she told her story tears rolled down her cheeks.”

The findings of the court, all sustained by the evidence, may be quoted at length, as they contain a sufficient recital of all facts necessary to this consideration :

Under these findings the court awarded plaintiff,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.