Criminal Law—Robbery — Property of Foreign Corporation—Evidence—Proof of De Facto Corporation.—Where an information for the crime of robbery charges that the property taken was the property of a corporation organized under the laws of the territory of Colorado, and doing business in the state of California, evidence of a de facto corporation is sufficient to sustain the charge as laid, and it is not essential to prove a legal incorporation under the laws of the territory.

Id.—Proof of Ownership—Possession—Agency.—In the absence of evidence to the contrary, in larceny or robbery, proof of possession of the stolen property by the person from whom it was taken is sufficient evidence of ownership; and proof that it was taken from the possession of the agents of the corporation to whom it is alleged to belong, is sufficient proof of its ownership, the possession of the agents of the company being the possession of the company.

Id.—Declarations of Conspirator — Hearsay — Extrajudicial Admissions—Proof of Robbery.—Evidence of the statements of a coconspirator, made during the life of the conspiracy, are admissible against the other conspirator; hut declarations made by such coconspirator . after the crime has been committed, are hearsay, and inadmissible, nor can the existence of a robbery be proved as against the defendant by the extrajudicial admissions of a coconspirator, made after the commission of the offense.

Id.—Error not Cured—Testimony of Conspirator—Instruction.— Error in admitting the declaration of a coconspiratoi^ made after the commission of the robbery as to the details of the robbery is not cured by the fact that such coconspirator testified to the same statements, nor by an instruction of the court to disregard any statements or confessions of the accomplice other than his sworn testimony.

Id.—Distrust of False Witness—Erroneous Instruction.—If is error to instruct the jury that it is their duty, as matter of law, if they believe a witness to be willfully false in one part of his testimony, to reject all of his testimony.

Id.—Instruction not Justified by Evidence.—The court should not give an instruction which is not justified by any evidence.