Divorce—Extreme Cruelty—Uncorroborated Evidence of Party— Finding against Evidence.—Where the evidence of extreme cruelty, upon which a divorce is partly based, consists wholly of the uncorroborated evidence of the party seeking a divorce upon that ground, there is no sufficient evidence to sustain the divorce upon that ground.

Id.—Desertion by Wife—Division of Community Property—Reversal of Judgment.—Where a divorce is granted to the husband for the alleged extreme cruelty of the wife, and also for her desertion of the husband, and the divorce is not sustainable upon the ground of extreme cruelty, it is error to award all of the community property to the husband, but the court must divide it equally between the parties.

Id.—Jurisdiction — Separate Property of Wife.—Upon granting a divorce to the husband, the court has no jurisdiction to make any 'award as to the separate property of the wife.

-Sn.—Conveyance from Husband to Wife—Water Right not Reserved. Where the husband conveyed land to his wife through her father, without making any reservation as to the water flowing from an artesian well upon the land granted, such well passed with the land, and they both became the separate property of the wife; and the court has no jurisdiction, upon granting a divorce to the husband, to dispose of any part of the water right to the husband.

■ So.—Evidence—Separate Moneys Advanced to Common Funds—Tracing of Moneys.—For the purpose of ascertaining the community property, the husband and wife are each entitled to prove what moneys which were the separate property of either were put into the common funds; but such moneys cannot be considered as separate property, unless they can be traced and segregated from the mass of the community property.

Si'.—Appeal—Disposition of Community Property—Findings—Reversal—Retrial of Issue.—The appellate court can deal separately with that part of a decree in a divorce case which disposes of the community 'property, without disturbing other parts of the decree, and, if the findings clearly show what the community property is, may direct the •court to award one equal half thereof to each of the parties, but where the findings are not clear on that subject, and the parties are entitled to an equal division of the community property, it will reverse a judgment awarding it to the husband, and direct a retrial of the issue as to •community property, unless the parties can agree thereon, and to de" termine definitely what the community property is, and to amend the decree by adjudging an equal division thereof.