Smilie

Smilie v. Fresno County

Good Law
112 Cal. 311·1896 Cal. LEXIS 681·44 P. 556
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 7, 1896No. 18434California739 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Britt, J.

Certain persons, to whose rights plaintiff has succeeded by assignment, entered into a contract with the county of Fresno, whereby they agreed to build'additions to the county courthouse, and to complete the same within the space of fifteen months from the date of the contract, which was December 14, 1891; the county, on its part, agreed to pay them therefor the sum of ninety-nine thousand three hundred and eighty-seven dollars “ in gold coin or county warrants,” seventy-five per cent thereof in monthly installments, according to the stage of advancement of the work, and the remainder within thirty-five days after completion of the structure. The building was not finished until November 8, 1893, but this delay was within certain saving clauses of the contract, and was assented to by defendant, and on the day last mentioned the county accepted the work as fully completed in accordance with the contract. A balance of six thousand seven hundred and eight dollars and sixty-two cents remains unpaid on the said contract price, and to recover such balance is the object of this action. Plaintiff’s complaint averred the facts above stated, and also set forth, among other matters, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.