Ex parte Jentzsch

Good Law
112 Cal. 468·1896 Cal. LEXIS 701·44 P. 803
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 17, 1896Crim. No. 97California1,689 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Petitioner was convicted under section 310-J of the Penal Code, which is a new section, enacted in 1895, and "which provides as follows: “Every person who as proprietor, manager, lessee, employee or agent keeps open or conducts, or causes to be kept open or conducted, any barber-shop, bath-house and barber-shop, barber-shop of a bathing establishment or hair-dressing establishment, or any place for shaving or hair-dressing used and conducted in connection with any other place of business or resort, or who engages at work or labor as a barber in any such shop or establishment on Sun *471 day, or on a legal holiday, after the hour of 12 o’clock m. of said day, is guilty of a misdemeanor.”

It is contended that the section is in violation of the following constitutional provisions:

In construing so-called Sunday laws, courts have variously regarded them, some from a religious view, others from a secular, and still others from an anomalous commingling of both. In this state they have never been upheld from a religious standpoint. Under a constitution which guarantees to all equal liberty of religion and conscience, any law which forbids an act not in itself contra bonos mores,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.