Wormouth

Wormouth v. Gardner

Good Law
112 Cal. 506·1896 Cal. LEXIS 704·44 P. 806
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 1, 1896S. F. No. 157California1,785 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

Upon the former appeal in this case ( Wormouth v. Gardner, 105 Cal. 149 ), the plaintiff's right of recovery was based upon a homestead entry, and the receipt of the receiver of the United States land-office for the cash payment thereof. The trial of the cause below, from which that appeal was taken, was had in the year 1892, and intermediate the decision upon that trial and the decision of this court upon the appeal, a patent for the land described in the complaint was issued to the plaintiff by the United States, and upon the going down of the remittitur the defendants filed a supplemental answer and a cross-complaint, setting forth this issuance of the patent to the plaintiff, and alleging other facts by virtue of which they claimed that the plaintiff holds the patent in trust for them, and asked that the court decree that he execute to them a conveyance of the said land. To this supplemental answer and to the cross-complaint the plaintiff filed a general demurrer, *509 which was sustained, and, the defendants declining to amend, judgment was thereafter rendered in favor of the plaintiff. From this judgment the defendants have appealed.

The facts alleged by the defendants in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.