White

White v. White

Good Law
112 Cal. 577·1896 Cal. LEXIS 714·44 P. 1026
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 9, 1896S. F. No. 485California1,063 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to file the transcript within the time prescribed by rule II of this court.

The judgment from which the appeal is taken was entered in the superior court February 9, 1895, and the appeal therefrom was perfected April 13, 1895. The plaintiff gave notice of his intention to move for a new trial on the 19th of February, 1895, and on March 29th served his proposed bill of exceptions and statement of the case on said motion, to which the defendant proposed amendments. December 6th the proposed bill and amendments came on for settlement before the judge, and he, deeming that the proposed bill did not correctly set forth the proceedings had in the case, outlined the nature of the bill which he would settle, and directed the plaintiff within sixty days from that date to prepare and serve upon the defendant a bill of exceptions in accordance therewith, and gave to the defendant thirty days thereafter within which to propose amendments thereto, after which the usual and statutory proceedings in reference to settlement were to be had. Under this order the plaintiff served his proposed bill of exceptions upon the defendant January 27, 1896. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.