Cline

Cline v. Robbins

Good Law
112 Cal. 581·1896 Cal. LEXIS 715·44 P. 1023
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 9, 1896Sac. No. 64California1,311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

It is averred in the complaint that on November 5, 1890, plaintiff executed a certain deed of conveyance of certain property known as the Cline Water Works and appurtenances to the defendant: that while said deed upon its face conveyed the title of said property to defendant, yet it was intended by the parties to be a mortgage as security for the payment by plaintiff to defendant of the sum of seven hundred and eighty-five dollars, with interest at nine per cent per annum, and that it was understood between said parties that upon the payment of said sum of money and interest the indenture should become void, and defendant should reconvey the property to plaintiff. It is further averred that defendant wrongfully took possession of said property, and has received the income thereof, which should be applied to the payment of the said averred mortgage. It is further averred that said income, so received by defendant, is more than sufficient to satisfy the amount secured by said mortgage aforesaid, but that, if upon an accounting there should be found any balance due defendant from plaintiff, plaintiff offers to pay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.