John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Butler

Good Law
112 Cal. 677·1896 Cal. LEXIS 731·45 P. 6
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 22, 1896S. F. No. 129California315 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

The trial court overruled defendant’s genera] demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. Defendant refusing to answer, judgment against him was entered. From this judgment he appeals.

The plaintiff, a creditor of the S. S. Construction Company, a corporation, sought to charge defendant as a stockholder thereof for his proportionate share of the debt. The complaint averred the amount of capital stock of the defendant corporation, and the number of shares into which it was divided. It likewise averred ownership in defendant of a certain specified number of shares of this stock during the period within which the liability was created. But it did no more than this. It did not allege, nor can it be determined from the complaint, what the total number of the subscribed shares actually was, nor what proportion the holding of this defendant bore to the total amount of subscribed stock. As the number of individual stockholders’ shares is to the whole number of subscribed shares, so is his proportion of the debt to the total amount of the debt. Unless, therefore, these three known factors are pleaded, namely, the number of the stockholders’ shares, the total *679 of the subscribed shares, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.