Turner

People v. Turner

Bad Law
113 Cal. 278·1896 Cal. LEXIS 775·45 P. 331
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 16, 1896Crim. No. 164California825 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of forgery, and from the judgment and from the order denying him a new trial prosecutes these ap *280 peals. The information, it is admitted, contained two counts. By the first it is charged that the defendant, having in his possession a deed of a piece of realty made and executed by one Lizzie O’Donnell to J. P. Frenna, did “willfully, unlawfully, knowingly, feloniously, falsely, and fraudulently make and forge on the back of said deed a certificate in the handwriting of T. A. Bell, recorder of Fresno county, of the recordation of said deed.in the county records of said county of Fresno, which said false, fraudulent, and forged certificate purported to recite that the aforesaid deed had been, to wit, on the twenty-second day of September, A. D. 1892, filed in the office of the county recorder of said county of Fresno for record, and had been recorded in the county records of said county, at a time, in a book, and at a certain page, specified in said false, fraudulent, and forged certificate and handwriting, and which said false, fraudulent, and forged certificate purported to be signed by said T. A. Bell, recorder of said county of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.