Conlin

Conlin v. Board of Supervisors

Good Law
114 Cal. 404·1896 Cal. LEXIS 913·46 P. 279
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 3, 1896S. F. No. 299California2,510 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

At the last session of the legislature the following act was passed March 28, 1895 (Stats. 1895, p. 348):

The appellant thereafter presented his claim to the board of supervisors for said sum of money, together with a duly authenticated copy of said act, and demanded that the same be allowed and ordered paid. The board of supervisors refused to allow the same, and thereupon the plaintiff made application to the superior court for a *407 writ of mandate compelling said board to allow the claim. A demurrer to his petition was sustained by the superior court, and from the judgment entered thereon the present appeal has been taken.

The validity of this act is assailed by the respondents upon the ground that the legislature has not the power to direct the payment of moneys out of the treasury of the city and county of San Francisco, against its will, or without its consent. It is conceded by the appellant that the legislature has not the power to direct or command the municipality to make a gift of its funds, but it is contended on his behalf that the legislature has such control over these funds that it may appropriate them for any public purpose, and that, as courts cannot look…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.