Thomas

Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.

Good Law
115 Cal. 136·1896 Cal. LEXIS 984·46 P. 899
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1896L. A. No. 111California1,855 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fleet, J.

The single question involved in this appeal is whether the action is barred by the statute of limitations, and the question arises upon the face of the complaint under the demurrer interposed.

The action, which was commenced September 24, 1894, is to recover back with interest the purchase money paid by plaintiff to defendant under five several contracts of even date for the conveyance of land. Each contract covers a separate parcel or lot of land, and each is counted upon in a separate count. The five counts are identical in averment, excepting only in the description of the lot and price to be paid, and the first will serve as a type of all. Its substance is, that on the twelfth day of December, 1887, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract, by the terms of which defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff lot 11, in block 358, of Pacific Beach, for five hundred dollars, with interest on deferred 'payments at ten per cent per annum; payable one hundred and sixty-seven dollars at the date of agreement, one hundred and sixty-six dollars and interest June 12, 1888,- and one hundred and sixty-seven dollars and interest December 12, 1888; and that in consideration of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.