Fairbanks

Fairbanks v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.

Good Law
115 Cal. 579·1897 Cal. LEXIS 478·47 P. 450
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 1897S. F. No. 427California822 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Britt, J.

Fairbanks and the National Fire Insurance Company joined in this action to recover damages for the destruction of a certain building by fire, resulting from defendant’s negligence. It was alleged in the complaint that the building was the property of Fairbanks, of the value of eighteen hundred and thirty-five dollars, and insured by the insurance company for nine hundred dollars, which latter sum said company paid to Fairbanks before the commencement of the action; also, that Fairbanks’ business carried on in the building was interrupted by its destruction, to his loss of profit, stated at three hundred dollars; plaintiffs prayed damages in the sum of two thousand one hundred and thirty-five dollars. A demurrer to the complaint for misjoinder of plaintiffs and of causes of action was overruled, and defendants answered, denying, among other things, that Fairbanks owned the building.

■ It appeared in evidence that one Fulton formerly owned a tract of land which included said structure; December 10, 1872, he conveyed the land to defendant by deed containing a reservation of the “ right to maintain” the building, with the privilege of ingress and egress to and from the same over the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.