N. P. Contracting & Paving Co. v. City of Pasadena

Good Law
116 Cal. 6·1897 Cal. LEXIS 498·47 P. 777
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1897L. A. No. 195California618 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Henshaw, J.

Plaintiff submitted to the defendant a bid for the performance of certain street work, and with the bid deposited its certified checks in the sum of three thousand dollars. Plaintiff was awarded the contract, but, becoming convinced that the proceedings were illegal, it refused to proceed, declined to enter into the contract, and made demand for the return of its checks. Defendant refused to comply with the demand, cashed the checks, and retained the money under a claim of forfeiture. This action was instituted for its recovery. *8 From the judgment rendered against it and from the order denying it a new trial, defendant appeals.

Appellant contends that its demurrer should have been sustained, and its motion for a nonsuit granted, upon the ground that plaintiff, having become a successful bidder, suffered absolute and unconditional forfeiture by its refusal to enter into the contract. The street law, in terms, declares that if the bidder “ fails, neglects, or refuses to enter into the contract, .... then the-certified check accompanying his bid, and the amount therein mentioned, shall be declared to be forfeited.” (Stats. 1891, p. 199.) It is upon this language that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.