Crooks

United States v. Crooks

Good Law
116 Cal. 43·1897 Cal. LEXIS 505·47 P. 870
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 1897No. 9613California916 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The United States brought the present action against the appellant and many other defendants for the condemnation of a strip of land lying between the San Leandro and San Antonio estuaries for the purpose of constructing a tidal canal by which to turn the water from San Leandro Bay or estuary into the head óf San Antonio estuary. The complaint contains a description of the strip of land sought to be condemned, and also separate descriptions of the portions thereof belonging to each of the defendants, of which three are alleged to be claimed by the appellant. The superior court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the condemnation of the entire strip, and awarding damages to each of the defendants for the value of their respective parcels of land so condemned. The appellant moved for a new trial, and the same was heard upon a statement of the case and denied. From this order and also from the judgment he has appealed.

The appeal from the judgment was taken more than one year after its entry, and must therefore be dismissed.

*45 The appellant’s notice of intention to move for a new trial was served upon the plaintiff alone, and also his notice of appeal from the order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.