Heller

Heller v. Dyerville Manufacturing Co.

Good Law
116 Cal. 127·1897 Cal. LEXIS 522·47 P. 1016
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 1897S. F. No. 421California2,012 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fleet, J.

This is a suit in equity brought in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco to secure the modification of a judgment theretofore entered in that court, upon the ground that it was procured by fraud.

The complaint alleges that in March, 1891, the present defendant, the Dyerville Manufacturing Company, brought an action in said superior court against M. Heller & Sons, the plaintiffs here, to enjoin the latter from pirating or infringing a certain trademark or label of said Dyerville Manufacturing Company, and for damages for an infringement already perpetrated. That, thereafter, on August 3, 1891, the parties in that *131 action entered into a stipulation in writing that judgment should be entered therein enjoining the defendants “ as prayed for in the complaint,” and for costs, but without damages. That afterward, on August 7, 1891, the attorney for the plaintiff in that action, “ for the purpose of cheating and defrauding these plaintiffs,” presented to the judge before whom said action was pending a decree prepared by said attorney, which the latter represented to the judge “was in accordance with the stipulation”; that the judge relied upon such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.