Schmidt

Schmidt v. Mesmer

Caution
116 Cal. 267·1897 Cal. LEXIS 536·48 P. 54
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1897L. A. No. 163California1,860 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged false and fraudulent represénta *268 tion made by the defendant to the plaintiffs with respect to a certain lease executed between the parties. The jury found a verdict for the defendant, and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

On December 30, 1893, the defendant was the owner of certain real property in Los Angeles, described generally as the United States Hotel. On that day the parties executed a written instrument, by which the defendant leased said property to plaintiffs for a term of three years, commencing January 1, 1894, at the monthly rent of eight hundred dollars, payable on the first day of each month, and the plaintiffs agreed to pay said sum of money as rent on the first day of each month, and entered into certain other covenants not necessary to be here mentioned. The upper floors of the building on the premises had been used, and were intended to be used, as a hotel; and there were two storerooms on the first story, and also rooms used as a bar-room, barber shop, laundry, etc., which were included in the lease.

The gist of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.