Church

People v. Church

Caution
116 Cal. 300·1897 Cal. LEXIS 543·48 P. 125
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 17, 1897Crim. No. 210California1,311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Defendant was charged with the crime of robbery, alleged to have been committed by taking from the person of one Smith a certain gold watch of the value of ninety dollars, one gold chain of the value of thirty dollars, and one gold knife of the value of five dollars. It is further charged that the property belonged to Smith, and that force and intimidation were used in the taking. He was convicted, and now prosecutes this appeal.

The offense here charged is claimed to have been committed in a saloon, in the presence of various habitues of that resort, and all the evidence of the prosecution bearing upon the actual taking of the property may be summed up as follows: One witness testified: Saw some difficulty between defendant and Mr. Smith. Saw defendant grab a- watch from Mr. Smith’s vest and run through the door with it. I did not notice whether the chain was gold or silver. It was a kind of reddish or yellow color. I saw a watch attached to it.” Cross-examination: “At the time the watch was taken we were standing around the bar. The first I saw of Church [defendant] after we were standing up at the bar was when he grabbed for the chain. I saw him make a motion toward it. Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.