Tibbets

Tibbets v. G. Cohn & Co.

Good Law
116 Cal. 365·1897 Cal. LEXIS 553·48 P. 372
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 30, 1897S. F. No. 368California1,698 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This action was brought to recover the value of certain property alleged to have been transferred to defendants within one month before the com *366 mencement of proceedings in insolvency, in violation of the Insolvency Act. In the complaint it is averred that on the nineteenth day of May, 1892, one Charles W. Pick, being insolvent, filed his petition alleging.his insolvency, and praying to be discharged from his liabilities; that such proceedings were had that plaintiff was, on August 24, 1892, appointed receiver of the estate of said insolvent pending the election of an assignee. Facts are then alleged tending to show that within one month before the commencement of said proceedings the defendants, who were creditors of the insolvent, received a transfer of all the available assets of the insolvent, in payment of defendant’s demand against the insolvent, and that Pick and the defendants well knew of the insolvency of Pick, and intended by said transfer thereby to prevent the property from coming into the possession of the assignee, etc.

Before answering the defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground that the same does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.