Sawtelle

Sawtelle v. Muncy

Good Law
116 Cal. 435·1897 Cal. LEXIS 567·48 P. 387
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 7, 1897L. A. No. 196California1,085 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

Action to foreclose a mortgage executed by R. E. Muncy and Sadie E. Muncy, his wife, to secure the payment of a promissory note for $1,295, made by R. E. Muncy September 7, 1888, and payable on or before two years after date, with interest at ten per cent per annum. Defense, want of consideration, menace, and fraud. Defendants had judgment. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and supports his appeal by a bill of exceptions. The cause was tried by the court without a jury.

The findings show that the note in suit was made without valuable, consideration; that the note and mortgage were procured by false representations on the part *437 of plaintiff and by menace, consisting of threats of a criminal prosecution against defendant B. E. Muncy, and of consequent injury to his character, and that the mortgage was executed by defendants, and each of them, under the influence of such menace, and would not otherwise have been made or executed.

Appellant contends that the findings are not supported by the evidence, and specifies various particulars in which the evidence fails to support the several findings. For the sake of brevity we shall consider the objections together. The evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.