Lamberson

Lamberson v. Jefferds

Good Law
116 Cal. 492·1897 Cal. LEXIS 578·48 P. 485
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 8, 1897Sac. No. 231California721 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

Respondent asks that the appeal herein be dismissed on the ground that no undertaking on appeal was given, nor was there an order of court dispensing with the undertaking, as authorized by section 946 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Appellant claims that his case comes within the provisions of section 1058 of the Code óf Civil Procedure, which reads as follows: “ Any civil action or proceeding wherein the state, or the people of the state, is a party plaintiff, or any state officer, in his official capacity, or in behalf of the state, or any county, city and county, city, or town, is a party plaintiff or defendant, no bond, written undertaking or security can be required of the state, or the people thereof, or any officer thereof, or of any county, city and county, city or town; but on complying with the other provisions of this code, the state, or the people thereof, or any state officer acting in his official capacity, have the same rights, remedies, and benefits as if the bond, undertaking or security were given and approved, as required by this code.”

It will be observed that the section makes special mention of the state and state officers, but while it mentions counties it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.