Davis

Davis v. Randall

Good Law
117 Cal. 12·1897 Cal. LEXIS 610·48 P. 906
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 12, 1897Sac. No. 178California1,986 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

In August, 1893, there were pending in the superior court two certain actions, in each of which the appellant here, Davis, and the respondent,' Mary J. Randall, were the main contestants.

One of these actions was brought in the name of E. C. Vancil, to foreclose two certain mortgages upon the premises described in the complaint, one executed October 19, 1883, by the defendant, Nicholas W. Randall, who was then the owner of the premises, to one A. Montgomery to secure a promissory note made by said Randall to said Montgomery for the sum of nine thou *14 s ind dollars, with interest, and the other a mortgage upon said premises, executed October 1, 1884, by said Randall to said E. C. Vancil, to secure a promissory note made by said Randall to said Vancil for the sum of five thousand dollars, and interest. The said mortgage to Montgomery had been assigned to said Vancil before the commencement of this suit; and during the pendency of the action the said Davis was substituted as plaintiff in place of said Vancil, upon a showing that said Vancil had assigned both of said mortgages to said Davis. In said action the said Nicholas W. Randall made default; but the said Mary J. Randall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.