Adams

Adams v. Weaver

Good Law
117 Cal. 42·1897 Cal. LEXIS 615·48 P. 972
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 20, 1897Sac. No. 163California2,126 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

These are two actions of replevin, brought by the respondents respectively, and, by stipulation of counsel, tried together.

The appeal is from an order in each case denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, and the two cases come up on the same record.

The question involved in each case (aside from a proposition involving the exclusion of a deposition offered by defendant as testimony) relates to the validity of certain conveyances of the property in dispute made by one J. R. Williams to the plaintiffs in the actions.

The property transferred to plaintiff Elizabeth Adams is a combined steam harvester and engine, and that transferred to Elizabeth Adams and L. 0. Stephens, executrix and executor of D. 0. Adams, deceased, consists of horses, mules, sheep, farming implements, hay) grain, etc., all of which was situate on the D. O. Adams ranch in the county of Yolo.

The defendant, N. M. Weaver, is sheriff of the county of Yolo, and, as such, levied upon the property in dispute under an execution upon a judgment in favor of Stanton, Thompson & Co., and against J. R. Williams, for $2,375.78 and costs, entered October 4, 1892.

The execution was levied October 4, 1892, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.