Lundin

People v. Lundin

Good Law
117 Cal. 124·1897 Cal. LEXIS 630·48 P. 1024
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 25, 1897Crim. No. 251California921 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

Defendant was charged by information with the crime of forgery, alleged to have been committed at the city and county of San Francisco, on or about December 18, 1895. To the information defendant pleaded: 1. Not guilty; 2. Once in jeopardy; 3. Former acquittal.

Upon the trial the defendant was found guilty as charged. The jury also found for the “people on former pleas” of once in jeopardy and former acquittal.

Thereupon judgment was entered that defendant be punished by imprisonment in the state prison of the state of California at San Quentin for the term of four years.

Defendant appeals from the judgment, from an order denying his motion for arrest of judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The determination of a single question is conclusive of the appeal. The defendant was charged with the forgery and uttering as genuine a certain check or instrument in writing, of which the following is a copy:

At the trial there was evidence tending to show that about 7 o’clock p. m. of December 18, 1895, the defendant, John Lundin, who passed under the name of Thompson, in company with one Albrecht and a man named Nelson, who professed to be the indorser and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.