Cook

Cook v. Cockins

Good Law
117 Cal. 140·1897 Cal. LEXIS 633·48 P. 1025
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 25, 1897L. A. No. 176California5,121 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

On February 13, 1894, Caroline M. Cook, now deceased (referred to herein as plaintiff) wife of Joseph A. Cook, filed her verified complaint in the superior court of Riverside county, alleging owner *143 ship of certain land situated therein, and claiming an undivided one-fourth interest in the land, and an ownership of an undivided three-fourths interest in the same land in the defendant, and praying for partition of their several interests. The defendant filed a verified answer denying that the plaintiff was the owner of any interest in said land. For a separate answer to the complaint the defendant alleged:

That defendant and said Joseph A. Cook, on January 31, 1891, became the owners as tenants in common of the land, by virtue of certain legal proceedings, in the proportion, to wit, the defendant an undivided three-fourths interest and the said Joseph A. Cook an undivided one-fourth interest, and that they were such owners in fact at the commencement of the action; that the interest of said Joseph A. Cook was subject to the lien and claim of defendant by virtue of proceedings in attachment commenced by him against the said Joseph A. Cook in the superior court of Los Angeles…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.