Huellmantel

Huellmantel v. Huellmantel

Good Law
117 Cal. 407·1897 Cal. LEXIS 673·49 P. 574
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 25, 1897S. F. No. 609California1,358 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This is an action for a divorce brought by a wife against her husband. Certain other persons were made defendants, as claiming some interest in the property involved in the litigation. The court found that the defendant was guilty of extreme cruelty and willful neglect. A decree was entered granting a divorce to plaintiff upon these grounds, and also making disposition of certain property. The husband and also the defendants, Herman Scholden, Francis Steffen, and Rosalia Steffen, appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The evidence as to the extreme cruelty and willful neglect was no doubt somewhat conflicting, but we think that it fully warranted the court below in finding those issues in favor of the respondent. This is certainly so as to the charge of extreme cruelty; and, that being established, the finding as to willful neglect is immaterial. That part of the judgment which decrees a divorce is clearly correct and should not be disturbed.

But that part of the decree which disposes of the property interests involved is erroneous. Upon a first examination of the case we were inclined to think that the judgment might be modified, but upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.