Lambert

Lambert v. Schmalz

Good Law
118 Cal. 33·1897 Cal. LEXIS 728·50 P. 13
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 1897S. F. No. 570California1,367 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

On December 13, 1893, the defendant, for a valuable consideration, executed to the plaintiff his promissory-note for the sum of seven hundred and fifty dollars, payable ninety days after date, with interest at the rate of two per cent per month from date until paid. On June 12, 1894, the defendant was discharged in insolvency “from all his then existing debts, and among others the said indebtedness on said promissory note above mentioned.” In the months of January and February, 1894, defendant paid on the note the interest due in those months, in April following he made a payment of twenty-five dollars, and between the months of July, 1894, and March, 1895, inclusive, he made several other payments aggregating one hundred and seventy-four dollars. He afterward refused to make any more payments, and thereupon plaintiff commenced this action. The complaint alleged, among other things, “that subsequent to the said discharge in insolvency and at various times in the months of July and August, 1894, the said defendant, Will *35 iam Schmalz, promised and agreed to and with tbis plaintiff that he would pay to this plaintiff the full amount of said promissory note, to wit, the sum of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.