Blythe

Blythe v. Hinckley

Good Law
118 Cal. 347·1897 Cal. LEXIS 776·50 P. 545
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1897S. F. No. 98California445 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The Supreme Court of the United States issued a mandate to this court in. the matter of the estate of Thomas H. Blythe, deceased. That mandate recited: “And whereas in- the present term of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-sis, the said cause came on to be heard before the supreme court of the United States on the said transcript of record, and on motions to dismiss or to affirm, which were argued by counsel, on consideration whereof it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the writ of error in this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the want of jurisdiction; and that the said appellee, Florence Blythe Hinckley, recover against the said appellants fourteen dollars and seventy-five cents, for her costs herein expended, and have execution therefor, May 24, 1897. And the same is hereby remanded to you, the said judges of the said supreme court of the state of California, in order that such execution and proceedings may be had in the said cause in conformity with the judgment and decree of this court above stated, as according to right and justice/’ etc.

Upon the presentation of the aforesaid mandate to this court, it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.