Spaulding

Spaulding v. Dow

Good Law
118 Cal. 424·1897 Cal. LEXIS 793·50 P. 543
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 1, 1897S. F. No. 676California1,155 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fleet, J.

Action for breach of an alleged warranty of the capacity of a pump manufactured and sold by defendant to plaintiff. The material averments of the complaint are that the pump was sold and delivered to plaintiff on July 18, 1887, at the city of San Francisco, with the understanding by defendant that it was for use by plaintiff as a vacuum pump in the manufacture of sugar in the Hawaiian Islands; that as an inducement to plaintiff to purchase, and before the purchase was made, defendant represented that the pump was “fully equal” to a Blake vacuum pump (of a certain designated capacity), and gave plaintiff a written warranty guaranteeing such capacity. That plaintiff, relying upon such representations and warranty, purchased and paid for the pump, had it shipped to the Hawaiian Islands, and there tried in good faith to use it for the intended purpose; but that the defendant’s representations were false; that the pump was not as represented and guaranteed, but was and is useless for the purposes for which it was purchased; that by reason of the premises plaintiff suffered damage, for which judgment is asked.

The answer sets up that the pump was constructed in pursuance of an offer or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.