In re the Estate of Smith

Good Law
118 Cal. 462·1897 Cal. LEXIS 798·50 P. 701
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 4, 1897S. F. No. 990California1,927 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This is an appeal by tbe executor from a decree settling tbe executor’s third account and directing him to *463 pay a certain family allowance. Tbe decedent died testate October 17, 1892, having named Leon Sloss executor. Sloss qualified as executor November 16, 1892.

The testator leit a vineyard in Fresno county of one hundred ' and twenty-five acres. The vines were four years old. The executor toot possession and during the ensuing year—1893— expended in pruning, plowing, cultivating, and irrigating it $4858.84.

During the year 1894 he expended for the same purposes $757.91, and in connection with the sale of raisins from the vineyard, for drayage, etc., $483.17. In his account for that year he charged the estate $242 for interest on moneys advanced by him.

In the year 1895 he expended for like purposes the sum of $168.50, making a total, including the charges for interest, ⅞6,268.07.

May 31, 1894, an allowance was made to the widow of deceased of $150 per month from the death of decedent. At that time t-he executor had already expended $6,059.27 in caring for the vineyard.

In January, 1896, the widow caused the executor to be cited to show cause why he should not pay out…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.