Pignaz

Pignaz v. Burnett

Bad Law
119 Cal. 157·1897 Cal. LEXIS 871·51 P. 48
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 2, 1897S. F. No. 1184California2,227 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal of George W. Burnett and Annie Frances Burnett from the final judgment and also from an order refusing to vacate an order for a writ of assistance.

The action was for the foreclosure of a mortgage, and one William Nieol was a codefendant with the appellants. Nieol appeared in the action, and set up his claim to a lien subsequent to the lien of the plaintiff. Judgment was entered August 21, 1896. The appeal was taken July 31, 1897.

A sale of the mortgaged premises under the decree had taken place in November, 1896, at which the plaintiff was the purchaser. Thereafter, and until the eleventh day of June, 1897—• according to the verified statements of the appellant—the sheriff refused to issue a certificate of sale or to record a duplicate, and also refused to furnish appellants with the necessary data to enable them to redeem the premises from said sale. They also assert that the property was worth much more than was realized from said sale, and that they were ready and desirous of effecting a redemption.

The premises not having been redeemed, the sheriff, on the 26th of June, 1897, executed and delivered to the plaintiff a deed, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.