Wolters

Wolters v. King

Good Law
119 Cal. 172·1897 Cal. LEXIS 874·51 P. 35
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 3, 1897S. F. No. 637California1,214 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Belcher, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a sum of money, with interest, alleged to be due for lumber sold and delivered by him to defendants. The answer denied all the averments of the complaint. The court found: “That on the eighth day of November, 1892, the plaintiff, at the instance and request of the defendants, sold and delivered to said defendants lumber of the agreed price and value of one thousand and eighteen dollars and twenty-three cents, for which said defendant's promised and agreed to pay to said plaintiff, ninety days after said date, with interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum from and after the expiration of said ninety days.” Thei court further found that no part of the said money had been paid, and that plaintiff was entitled to a judgment therefor.

Judgment was accordingly so entered, from which and from an order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.

*174 It appears that in November, 1892, plaintiff was the owner of five hundred and twelve acres of timber land in Siskiyou county, which he wished to sell. The defendants were copartners, engaged in the business of buying and selling lumber in the city of San Francisco. The Bed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.