Rohrbacher

Rohrbacher v. Kleebauer

Good Law
119 Cal. 260·1897 Cal. LEXIS 889·51 P. 341
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1897S. F. No. 632California1,166 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

This action is prosecuted to recover from the defendant five thousand five hundred dollars and interest, upon a promissory note made by defendant to plaintiff on December 27, 1890, due six months after date.

The answer contains several defenses, alleging separately that there was no consideration for the note, that the consideration had wholly failed, and also alleged that said note was given for the purchase price of two thousand shares of the stock of the River, Harbor, and Canal Dredging and Land Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Colorado, of which the plaintiff was president and managing agent, and that he was induced to purchase said stock by and through the fraudulent misrepresentations of the plaintiff upon which he relied; the particulars of which need not be stated, as no question is made upon its sufficiency. It is sufficient to say that the alleged false representations were as to the value of a large tract of salt marsh land owned by the corporation, its sound financial condition, and the value of its stock.

These issues were tried before a jury. The plaintiff put in evidence said note and rested; and at the conclusion of defend-i ant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.