Ball

Ball v. Tolman

Good Law
119 Cal. 358·1897 Cal. LEXIS 902·51 P. 546
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 18, 1897S. F. No. 1011California1,967 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

This action is brought under the act approved April 23,1880, entitled “An act amendatory of an act for the better protection of the stockholders in corporations formed under the laws of the state of California for the purpose of carrying on and conducting the business of mining, approved March 30, 1874.” Trial by the court, and plaintiff had judgment for $1,000 liquidated damages and as penalty for the violation of said act. From the judgment and order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial this appeal is taken on a statement of the -case.

It appears from the evidence that the corporation of which defendants were directors, and in which plaintiff was a stockholder, fitted up a boat for dredging for gold in the sand in Oakland creek (Alameda county), but it does not appear that any work was done there. The boat was moved up the Sacramento river, and the dredger operated more or less in that river near sand below the mouth of the American river during the months of January, February, and March, 1896, and finally the scheme was abandoned as a failure. Plaintiff was employed as assistant superintendent about three months, and ceased work as such on the last of January, 1896. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.