In re Estate of Boody

Good Law
119 Cal. 402·1897 Cal. LEXIS 910·51 P. 634
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 22, 1897Sac. No. 383California1,292 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an appeal from an order of partial distribution of the estate of Joseph B. Boody, and from an order .refusing a new trial therein. The order distributes certain par *403 cels of real estate "belonging to said estate. The sole question ire issue is whether the lands so distributed were community, property or the separate property of Joseph B. Boody, deceased.

Joseph B. Boody died intestate, in the county of San Joaquin,. November 7, 1893, without issue, leaving him surviving as his heirs at law Elizabeth Boody, his widow, Emily Foss, a sister, and the children of a deceased brother. Elizabeth Boody, the widow, died intestate November 10, 1893, without issue, leaving as her next of Mn and heirs at law, a sister, one child of a. deceased sister, and the children of certain deceased brothers.

The heirs at law of Elizabeth Boody claimed on the distribution that the property in controversy was the community property of Joseph B. and Elizabeth Boody, his wife, and hence that they were entitled of right to have distributed to them three-fourths thereof. The court below denied this claim. It found that all the real estate involved was the separate property of Joseph B. Boody, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.