Wells

Wells v. Torrance

Good Law
119 Cal. 437·1897 Cal. LEXIS 915·51 P. 626
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 28, 1897S. F. No. 679California1,812 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Haynes, J.

Petition for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent, as judge of the superior court, from proceeding to entertain an appeal from an order made in the justice’s court under proceedings supplementary to execution. Wells, the petitioner, obtained a judgment against one Sidney Selover before a justice of the peace, execution was issued upon the judgment, and thereafter proceedings were duly taken for the examination of the judgment debtor under proceedings supplementary to execution, and an order was made therein against the defendant, requiring him to pay to the constable holding the execution the sum of forty-three dollars and fifty cents, that being one-half of the total sum of eighty-seven dollars, which last sum said justice found, as a matter of fact, was in the possession and under the control of said Selover at the time the order for his examination was served. ' Within thirty days after the making of said order Selover appealed therefrom to the superior court upon questions of both law and fact. Petitioner appeared specially in the superior court and moved to dismiss said appeal, on the ground that the superior court had no jurisdiction. Said motion was overruled by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.