Ryer

Ryer v. Oesting

Good Law
119 Cal. 564·1898 Cal. LEXIS 671·51 P. 857
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 1898S. F. No. 648California1,282 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fleet, J.

Appeal by defendants from an order denying them a new trial. The action is to recover certain installments alleged to be due plaintiff under a contract in writing between him and defendants which, by its terms, provided that if plaintiff, through his efforts, labor, and services, should procure and obtain for defendants from his father, Dr. Ryer, the owner of certain premises, a lease thereof for the term of three years, commencing on the first day of August, 1890, they would pay plaintiff for his services in securing the lease the sum of four hundred dollars per month during the entire term of such lease; it being alleged that in pursuance of such written contract plaintiff did, by his efforts and services, procure such lease in accordance with the terms thereof.

The answer admitted the execution of the written contract, but denied that the lease obtained by plaintiff was procured thereunder, and alleged in substance that the lease was procured in pursuance of another and verbal agreement made before the execution of the writing.

The evidence showed without substantial conflict that defendants, who were at the time occupying, under lease from plaintiff's father, certain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.