Elliott

People v. Elliott

Good Law
119 Cal. 593·1898 Cal. LEXIS 678·51 P. 955
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 15, 1898Crim. No. 292California474 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

An information filed against the defendant charged that in May, 1896, she did “willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously inveigle and entice into a certain house in Sacramento city, county of Sacramento, state of California, one Daisy McCarty, who then and there was an unmarried female of previous chaste character and under the age of eighteen years, to wit, of the age of twelve years, for the purpose of prostitution and to have illicit carnal connection with men.”

The case was tried and defendant found guilty. She moved for a new trial, which was denied, and thereupon judgment *594 was entered that she be punished by imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin for the term of five years and pay a fine of one thousand dollars. From that judgment and the order denying her motion for a new trial she has appealed.

The statute, section 266 of the Penal Code, provides: “Every person who inveigles or entices any unmarried female, of previous chaste character, under the age of eighteen years, into any house of ill-fame or of assignation, or elsewhere, for the purpose of prostitution, or to have illicit carnal connection with any man,” is punishable, etc.

The evidence introduced by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.