Falk

Falk v. Wittram

Good Law
120 Cal. 479·1898 Cal. LEXIS 792·52 P. 707
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1898L. A. No. 247California666 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Harrison, J.

The appellant, by his guardian, seeks in this action a judgment declaring that an instrument purporting to convey certain land to the grantor of the respondent was made by the appellant at a time when he was insane and incapable of contracting; that the instrument, although absolute in form, was in reality only a mortgage, and that the respondent took his conveyance from the grantee therein with knowledge of the appellant’s insanity at the time of its execution, and that it was given only as a mortgage. The instrument in question was executed April 14, 1875, and on January 31, 1893, the guardian of the appellant was appointed by the superior court of San Francisco, and the complaint herein in behalf of the appellant was filed March 20, 1894. Issues having been joined upon the allegations of the complaint, the cause was tried by the court, by whom findings of fact were made and filed negativing the material allegations of the complaint, and judgment thereon was ren *481 dered in favor of the respondent. From this judgment and an order denying a new trial, the present appeal has been taken. .

The appeal is urged here upon the ground that the findings of the court, both upon the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.