Hough

People v. Hough

Good Law
120 Cal. 538·1898 Cal. LEXIS 803·52 P. 846
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 8, 1898Crim. No. 354California740 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Garoutte, J.

Appellant has been convicted of a felony,, charged by the information to have consisted in the seduction of an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under promise of marriage.

Section 268 of the Penal Code provides: “Every person who, under promise of marriage, seduces and has sexual intercourse with an unmarried female of previous chaste character is punishable,” etc. Section 269 declares that a marriage of the parties prior to the filing of an information or the finding of an indictment for such offense is a bar to the prosecution thereof. The defendant asked the court to instruct the jury that the verdict should be “not guilty,” if defendant at all times prior to the filing of the information was ready and willing to marry the prosecuting witness, and that his failure to so marry was by reason of her refusal. This instruction was properly refused. When a man induces an unmarried female of previous chaste character to submit her person to him by reason of a promise of marriage upon his part, the seduction has taken place—the crime has been committed. The succeeding section, which provides that the marriage is a bar to a prosecution, clearly recognizes that the crime…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.