Lisenby

Lisenby v. Newton

Good Law
120 Cal. 571·1898 Cal. LEXIS 811·52 P. 813
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 9, 1898Sac. No. 420California958 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Britt, J.

Prettyman Barr, the plaintiff’s intestate, entered into a written contract with defendant Newton whereby Barr agreed to sell and Newton agreed to buy a certain tract of land; Newton promising to pay the stipulated price and interest thereon within two years from the date of the contract, and Barr covenanting to convey the land to Newton or his assigns on receiving such payment. The contract contained a provision that the stipulations thereof “are to apply to and bind the heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns of the respective parties.” Afterward, in consideration of a sum of money to him paid by defendant Sharpies, said Newton assigned all his right, title, and interest in and to the contract; and the premises which were the subject thereof, to said Sharpies. In virtue of such assignment Sharpies took possession of the land and made certain payments to Barr of principal and interest on account of the contract price. Plaintiff brought this suit on said contract against both Newton and Sharpies. The superior court rendered a decree ascertaining the amount of purchase money due from defendant Newton and ordering the sale of the land to raise such amount, with costs, etc., but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.