Avila

Avila v. Pereira

Good Law
120 Cal. 589·1898 Cal. LEXIS 814·52 P. 840
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 9, 1898Sac. No. 337California2,110 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Action to recover possession of certain lands ¡situated in Siskiyou county, title to which was at the commence- *591 anent of the action, and still is, admitted to be in ,the Central Pacific Railroad Company as part of its land grant. . :

It appears that the lands in question were improved by the erection of dwelling-house, barns, fences, a small orchard, and .about thirty acres of alfalfa, and some portions were under cultivation and were in the possession and occupancy of Manuel Cardoza. He died in 1889, and in January, 1890, Joseph Cardoza was appointed administrator of his estate. The land in controversy was returned by Joseph Cardoza in his inventory as belonging to the estate of Manuel Cardoza, deceased. Joseph Cardoza died before closing the administration (but when does not appear), and Thome Cardoza was appointed administrator in his stead. After filing his inventory, to wit, on January 20, 1890, •Joseph Cardoza applied to the railroad company to purchase the land in question. Subsequently, the interest of the estate in the premises was sold by order of the probate court after due proceedings had, and defendant became the purchaser and went into-possession under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.